<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweet Coraline&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/sweet-coraline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/sweet-coraline/</link>
	<description>Musings on Film, Art, and Music...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kdtsva</title>
		<link>http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/sweet-coraline/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>kdtsva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/?p=1228#comment-128</guid>
		<description>But see that&#039;s not the point... Tim Burton was not involved in Coraline, and yet I felt there was a similar visual style to it that people have accredited as being a primarily Burton-esque vision. At the very least its a collaboration and should be recognized as such! Point is, he is a great talent and I want to be able to attribute and discern his style over others, particularly when the general public is mistaken about his prior achievements... give props where props are due. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But see that&#8217;s not the point&#8230; Tim Burton was not involved in Coraline, and yet I felt there was a similar visual style to it that people have accredited as being a primarily Burton-esque vision. At the very least its a collaboration and should be recognized as such! Point is, he is a great talent and I want to be able to attribute and discern his style over others, particularly when the general public is mistaken about his prior achievements&#8230; give props where props are due. That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdavinci</title>
		<link>http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/sweet-coraline/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>jackdavinci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/?p=1228#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the book is like.

When I think Tim Burton I don&#039;t think of directing. I think of a mood, a style - something much more the result of art direction and writing. In an animated movie this is even more true - directing the voice acting and overseeing the animated are two very different jobs and it&#039;s not at all like directing a live action film. 

In any case when a movie has someone&#039;s name on it it doesn&#039;t imply anything about their role in the movie. All it implies is that they were involved in some way and have a bankable name. 

And let&#039;s be honest, whatever Tim&#039;s role might be, when you hear he&#039;s involved you pretty much know what to expect. I don&#039;t see a major discontinuity in the final product of his live and animated projects, despite any change in roles or involvement he might have had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the book is like.</p>
<p>When I think Tim Burton I don&#8217;t think of directing. I think of a mood, a style &#8211; something much more the result of art direction and writing. In an animated movie this is even more true &#8211; directing the voice acting and overseeing the animated are two very different jobs and it&#8217;s not at all like directing a live action film. </p>
<p>In any case when a movie has someone&#8217;s name on it it doesn&#8217;t imply anything about their role in the movie. All it implies is that they were involved in some way and have a bankable name. </p>
<p>And let&#8217;s be honest, whatever Tim&#8217;s role might be, when you hear he&#8217;s involved you pretty much know what to expect. I don&#8217;t see a major discontinuity in the final product of his live and animated projects, despite any change in roles or involvement he might have had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fangochris</title>
		<link>http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/sweet-coraline/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>fangochris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgconfuz.wordpress.com/?p=1228#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Coraline... what can I say except that it was great and now I want to read the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coraline&#8230; what can I say except that it was great and now I want to read the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
